Best practices and pitfalls

The “Shadow SaaS prevention” checklist

Visibility

• Log tokens and tool calls per step (not just per request)
• Tag every run with team, environment, workflow, and user
• Sample traces, but always capture aggregates (p50/p95 cost/run)

Control

• Cap max steps per run (loop limit)
• Cap max tool calls per run
• Cap max output tokens (verbosity limit)
• Add budget thresholds (warn, degrade, stop)

Optimization

• Use cached inputs where supported (cheaper than fresh input).
• Route: small model first, large model only on failure
• Keep RAG tight: fewer chunks, cleaner summaries, smaller context

Governance

• Define “approved agents” the way you define “approved apps”
• Require owners, SLAs, and audit logs for any agent that touches sensitive data
• Maintain a simple internal catalog: agent purpose, tools, data access, budgets

Common pitfalls that trigger cost spikes

• “Helpful” prompts that paste entire docs into context
• Tool outputs dumped back into the model unfiltered
• Retries without backoff (or retries that expand context each attempt)
• Multi-agent patterns without a spend budget per sub-agent
• No distinction between interactive vs batch workloads (missing big discounts)

Performance, cost, and security considerations

Cost levers that usually matter most

1. Output tokens are often the killer
   Frontier and “thinking” models can cost far more on output than input. OpenAI’s pricing examples show output can be multiples of input for flagship models (and also notes that text output tokens can include reasoning tokens).
2. Caching is underrated
   Where supported, cached input pricing can be an order of magnitude cheaper than standard input (example: GPT-5 mini cached input vs input).
3. Batching can cut costs for non-urgent runs
   If you can tolerate delay, batch pricing can significantly reduce costs (OpenAI explicitly highlights batch savings).
4. Tool calls are “the new SaaS seats”
   Web search and file search are billed differently than pure tokens (tool call fees, storage fees).

Security: shadow IT risk, now with data in the loop

Shadow IT is adopted for speed, but it creates monitoring gaps and security exposure when IT can’t see or govern it.
With agents, the risk increases because:

• agents can read and move data across systems via tools
• prompts can inadvertently capture sensitive info in logs
• “computer use” or browsing can introduce prompt injection risk surfaces (vendors highlight this as a concern in agentic browsing contexts).

Real-world use cases

Use case 1: IoT fleet ops triage (where token spend hides in telemetry)

Scenario: An agent summarizes device faults, clusters incidents, and drafts remediation steps.
Where cost creeps in:

• raw device logs pasted into context (huge input tokens)
• “let me think” reasoning verbosity (huge output tokens)
• repeated retrieval calls per incident batch

Fix pattern:

• summarize logs before the LLM sees them
• enforce max context + chunk limits
• batch overnight for non-urgent insights

Use case 2: Support ticket autopilot (where tool calls explode)

Scenario: Agent reads ticket + searches knowledge base + updates CRM + drafts response.
Silent budget killer: each ticket triggers multiple tool calls (search, CRM, attachments). If those tools are billed per call (or per storage/day), cost scales with volume fast.

Use case 3: Engineering copilot for code reviews (where long context becomes “normal”)

Long-context models (including million-token contexts) make it tempting to shove in entire repos or large diffs. Some vendors highlight very large context windows for agentic/coding workloads.
Fix pattern: budget-by-default plus selective context (only changed files, only relevant modules).

‍

FAQs

1) What is shadow SaaS in generative AI?

It’s when teams deploy AI tools and agents outside centralized governance — so spend, access, and risk accumulate without clear ownership, visibility, or budgets. Shadow IT is broadly defined as tech used without IT approval or oversight.

2) What is agent token spend?

It’s the accumulated cost of tokens consumed across agent runs — including planning steps, retries, tool outputs fed back into the model, and final responses.

3) Do “reasoning” tokens count toward billing?

They can. For example, OpenAI notes that text output tokens include model reasoning tokens (in relevant contexts), meaning “thinking” can increase billed tokens.

4) What costs exist beyond tokens?

Common “beyond tokens” costs include tool calls (web search, file search), vector storage, and hosted runtimes (like code execution containers).

5) How do we track token spend by team and workflow?

Instrument every run with IDs (user, agent, workflow, cost center) and store usage in a standard schema. FinOps guidance includes approaches and a sample schema for comprehensive tracking, plus notes on decentralized setups.

6) Will this work with our existing systems, or do we need to rebuild?

You usually don’t need to rebuild. Start by adding a single “metering layer” (proxy/gateway or middleware) that standardizes logging, tagging, and budgets. Then optimize prompts, retrieval, and routing iteratively.

7) How long until we see cost control improvements?

Often within days: step limits, output caps, caching, and model routing reduce spikes quickly. Deeper gains (better retrieval, better evaluations) follow after you have traces.

8) What’s the fastest way to stop a budget blowup today?

Implement: (1) per-run caps (tokens, steps, tool calls), (2) daily budgets by workflow, (3) a safe degradation mode (smaller model, fewer tools) when thresholds are hit.

‍